How a questionnaire runs 01 Choose a tab and a card. Personality, Career and Mental Health group the instruments; cards name each test and its item count, e.g. PHQ-9, 9 Q. 02 Answer each item. Picking an option advances after a short pause; the ← and → buttons walk the set and the progress bar counts answered items. 03 Watch for the crisis banner. In PHQ-9, any answer above "Not at all" on item 9 (thoughts of self-harm) raises the crisis banner at once, on the question and result pages, before any total exists. 04 Open the result. "See Results" appears only when every item is answered; the result shows the band, the instrument's description and score bars scaled to its range. 05 Retake or go back. Retake clears every answer and restarts the instrument; Back returns to the category list.
Worked readouts Every figure below comes from the page's own scoring code; the stated responses reproduce it.
Instrument
Responses
Readout
PHQ-9 (9)
"Several days" on all nine
9 → Mild (5-9) ; one item at "More than half the days" → 10 → Moderate (10-14)
GAD-7 (7)
"Several days" on all seven
7 → Mild (5-9)
SDS (20)
"Often" on all twenty
raw 50 → standard 62 → Moderate (60-69)
SAS (20)
"Rarely" on all twenty
raw 35 → standard 43 → Normal (<50)
WHO-5 (5)
"All of the time" on all five
100/100 , "Good well-being"
MBI (22)
"Every day" on all twenty-two
EE 54/54 , DP 30/30 , PA 48/48 — all High
K6 (6)
"Most of the time" on all six
18 → High distress (13-24)
ISI (7)
"Moderate" on all seven
14 → Subthreshold insomnia (8-14)
How a total becomes a band Each option carries points fixed by the instrument: 0–3 for PHQ-9, GAD-7 and K6; 1–4 for SDS and SAS; 0–4 for PSS-10; 0–6 for the MBI; 0–5 on WHO-5's six choices. Items add into one dimension, or several on the type panels, and the total meets the authors' cut-points: PHQ-9 at 5/10/15/20, GAD-7 severe at 15, K6 high at 13, ISI moderate at 15 and severe at 22. Two conversions matter: WHO-5 multiplies its raw 0–25 by four, and SDS/SAS take the integer part of raw × 1.25. Personality and career panels report percentages, each dimension divided by its own item maximum.
What the bands are not
Educational self-assessment, not a diagnosis or medical advice. Bands are triage thresholds from validation papers, and each instrument covers a fixed window — two weeks for PHQ-9, GAD-7 and WHO-5, one month for PSS-10. The gap between PHQ-9 9 and 10 is one answer: the result describes your replies, not a clinical assessment. Persistent distress or thoughts of self-harm belong with a health professional or crisis service, not this page.
Cut-points travel with their norms. The MBI bars use 0–6 scoring with MBI-HSS norms (EE high at 27, DP high at 13, PA low at 31); a 1–4 scoring would place the same person elsewhere. Zung's score is floored: raw 35 reads 43 , not 44. What it does not do: no clinical interpretation, treatment advice, risk stratification or record keeping. Published clinical scores live at Clinical Scores ; body, fitness, alcohol and pregnancy maths at Health .
Same word, two point values SDS catches hand-scoring. Ten of its twenty items are reverse-keyed — "I feel hopeful about the future" is the healthy answer — so the page flips the response words: "Always" scores 4 points forward and 1 reversed. Answering the same word on all twenty items gives raw 50 whichever word it is → standard 62 → Moderate (60-69) . Choosing by button position instead — always the third option — gives raw 60 → 75 → Severe (≥70) : one band apart. PSS-10 (six of ten items), Rosenberg (five of ten) and the MBTI's two introversion items reverse the same way.
Where it fits Preparing for a clinical conversation PHQ-9 9 is mild and 10 moderate: the total quantifies two weeks of frequency, while the items say which symptoms to raise. Note the highest items for an appointment; the page will not follow up.
A single instrument over time PSS-10 20 is moderate (14–26), WHO-5 60 still reads "Good well-being", and K6 18 reads high distress. Track one instrument against its own earlier readings, not across scales.
Team and self-reflection panels MBTI answers build four 0–50 axes and report I 84% against E 36% on an all-"Strongly Disagree" run; Gallup normalises each theme by its own item maximum, so a full-agreement run returns 100% everywhere.
Privacy All scoring runs inside your browser; answers are never uploaded and disappear on reload.
References
Kroenke, Spitzer & Williams, The PHQ-9 , J Gen Intern Med 16(9), 2001, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (访问日期:2026-10-01)— the 5/10/15/20 bands.
Spitzer, Kroenke, Williams & Löwe, The GAD-7 , Arch Intern Med 166(10), 2006, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (访问日期:2026-10-01)— the 5/10/15 cut-points.
Topp, Østergaard, Søndergaard & Bech, The WHO-5 Well-Being Index , Psychother Psychosom 84(3), 2015, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (访问日期:2026-10-01)— the ×4 conversion and the ≤50 threshold.
Morin, Belleville, Bélanger & Ivers, The Insomnia Severity Index , Sleep 34(5), 2011, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (访问日期:2026-10-01)— the 8/15/22 bands.
Kessler et al., Screening for serious mental illness in the general population , Arch Gen Psychiatry 60(2), 2003, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (访问日期:2026-10-01)— the 13 cut-point.
World Health Organization, Depressive disorder (depression) , who.int (访问日期:2026-10-01)— symptom duration and professional assessment.
Calculators in this hub
Hand-picked tools, one click away. The mini versions compute live and carry your values into the full calculator.
Sources & review
Reviewed by CalcX Editorial Team
Updated 2026-10-01 Kroenke, Spitzer & Williams, The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure, J Gen Intern Med 16(9), 606–613, 2001 (accessed 2026-10-01) Spitzer, Kroenke, Williams & Löwe, A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7, Arch Intern Med 166(10), 1092–1097, 2006 (accessed 2026-10-01) Topp, Østergaard, Søndergaard & Bech, The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: a systematic review of the literature, Psychother Psychosom 84(3), 167–176, 2015 (accessed 2026-10-01) Morin, Belleville, Bélanger & Ivers, The Insomnia Severity Index: psychometric indicators to detect insomnia cases and evaluate treatment response, Sleep 34(5), 601–608, 2011 (accessed 2026-10-01) Kessler et al., Screening for serious mental illness in the general population, Arch Gen Psychiatry 60(2), 184–189, 2003 (accessed 2026-10-01) World Health Organization, Depressive disorder (depression) fact sheet, 11 September 2026 (accessed 2026-10-01)